Prediction of Virginia Ruzici vs Greer Stevens Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
V. Ruzici vs G. Stevens

Virginia Ruzici

ROU

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Greer Stevens

RSA

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Ruzici 1 - 1 Stevens

They have played 5 sets in total, with Virginia Ruzici winning 2 and Greer Stevens winning 3. The last match between Greer Stevens and Virginia Ruzici was at the Los Angeles, 23-01-1978, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Greer Stevens getting the victory 6-4 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Ruzici	1
Stevens	1

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R3) Los Angeles(01-23-78)

Stats

Greer Stevens

Virginia Ruzici

() South Orange(08-18-75)

Stats

Virginia Ruzici

Greer Stevens

V. Ruzici vs G. Stevens H2H Profile

V. Ruzici	Stats	G. Stevens
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
63.04% (515-302)	Career Total W/L	61.51% (147-92)
1	Clay	0
0	Hard	1
8	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

V. Ruzici vs G. Stevens Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Virginia Ruzici has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Greer Stevens has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Virginia Ruzici, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Greer Stevens has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Virginia Ruzici has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Greer Stevens has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Virginia Ruzici has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Greer Stevens winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Virginia Ruzici has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 71% (W/L 145/60), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 23/21). Greer Stevens has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 71% (W/L 44/13), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 3/5).
Player level: In the last year, Virginia Ruzici has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Greer Stevens has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Virginia Ruzici winning 1 times and Greer Stevens being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Virginia Ruzici winning 2 and Greer Stevens winning 3.
The last match between Virginia Ruzici and Greer Stevens was at the Los Angeles, 23-01-1978, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Greer Stevens getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Virginia Ruzici has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Greer Stevens has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Virginia Ruzici has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Greer Stevens has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Virginia Ruzici has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Greer Stevens has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Virginia Ruzici vs Greer Stevens Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

V. Ruzici vs G. Stevens H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

V. Ruzici	Stats	G. Stevens
1	H2H Matches Won	1
2	Sets Won	3
23	Games Won	22
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

V. Ruzici Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Zurich - 25-10-1987
Q1 Gabrielle VilligerG. Villiger	L	2-6 6-3 6-3	Stats
Filderstadt - 12-10-1987
R3 Nathalie TauziatN. Tauziat	L	7-5 6-1	Stats
Athens - 05-10-1987
R3 Alexia Dechaume BalleretA. Dechaume	L	2-6 6-4 6-3	Stats
ITF Neumunster - 27-07-1987
R3 Cornelia LechnerC. Lechner	W	5-7 6-2 6-2	Stats
R4 Heidi SprungH. Sprung	L	3-6 7-5 6-2	Stats

View All

G. Stevens Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Sydney - 01-12-1980
R3 Barbara HallquistB. Hallquist	W	6-0 6-3	Stats
Sylvia HanikaS. Hanika	L	6-4 6-0	Stats
R4 Marie PinterovaM. Pinterova	W	6-4 6-1	Stats
Australian Open - 24-11-1980
R3 Susan LeoS. Leo	W	6-2 6-4	Stats
R4 Lindsay MorseL. Morse	W	6-7 6-0 6-0	Stats

View All

V. Ruzici vs G. Stevens Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

V. Ruzici	Stats	G. Stevens
63.04% (515/302)	YTD Win/Loss	61.51% (147/92)
60.98% (1111/711)	Sets Win/Loss	59.50% (310/211)
54.49% (9056/7564)	Games Win/Loss	54.72% (2561/2119)
56.80% (71/54)	Hard Win/Loss	61.54% (24/15)
69.91% (151/65)	Clay Win/Loss	37.50% (3/5)
55.07% (125/102)	Indoor Hard W/L	55.21% (53/43)
52.27% (23/21)	Grass Win/Loss	77.19% (44/13)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
63.64% (7/4)	Slam W/L	66.67% (2/1)
66.67% (14/7)	Cups W/L	75.00% (3/1)
71.43% (10/4)	Challenger W/L	0% (0/0)
70.59% (132/55)	Futures W/L	59.46% (22/15)
64% (510/798)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	62% (141/227)
38% (3/8)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/2)
59% (125/213)	Deciding Set Win %	60% (34/57)
91% (485/442)	1st Set Won, Won Match	91% (140/128)
9% (485/42)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	9% (140/12)
21% (326/70)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	18% (96/17)